Licensing your trademark lets a partner use your brand in return for payment, while you keep ownership and ultimate control. Done well, it opens new markets, new product categories and new revenue without the cost of entering those markets yourself, through franchising, merchandising, co-branding or distribution. Done badly, it dilutes the mark, confuses customers, and in the worst case puts the registration itself at risk. With trademarks more than any other IP right, the licence is not just a commercial document; it is part of how the right is maintained.
Scope comes first, as always: which marks, for which goods and services, in which territories, and whether the licence is exclusive, sole or non-exclusive. Then come the commercial terms, the royalties, minimum guarantees, reporting and audit rights that make the arrangement worth entering. But the term that sets trademark licensing apart is quality control. A trademark exists to tell customers that goods or services come from a particular source at a consistent standard. If the owner licenses the mark but does not control how the licensee uses it, the mark stops performing that function, and in some jurisdictions an uncontrolled or naked licence can weaken or even invalidate the registration. Quality-control provisions, brand guidelines, approval rights and inspection rights are therefore not optional extras to be negotiated away; they protect the asset you are licensing.
A good trademark licence also looks beyond the commercial term to the health of the brand. It controls how the mark may be presented, prevents uses that would tarnish or dilute it, deals with what happens to stock and marketing materials on termination, and makes clear that goodwill generated by the licensee's use accrues to the owner. These provisions are what stop a successful licensing programme from gradually eroding the brand it was meant to exploit.
Trademark licensing sits in the Commercialize stage of our 360 method and is part of our commercial contracts and transactions work. It builds on trademark protection upstream, because you can only license a mark that is properly secured, and the royalty income it generates can interact with the innovation income deduction on the tax side. The background reading sits in the Knowledge Base on structuring licensing agreements and distribution and reseller agreements, and the drafting is delivered through our Contract Studio and Clause Library technology.
We structure and draft the licence, negotiate the terms, and build in the quality control and reporting that keep the brand strong, then manage renewals and any enforcement against misuse so the programme grows the brand rather than diluting it.
Because a trademark guarantees a consistent source and standard to customers. If you license the mark without controlling how it is used, it stops doing that, and in some jurisdictions an uncontrolled licence can put the registration at risk. Quality-control terms protect both the customer relationship and the right itself.
An exclusive licence lets only the licensee use the mark in the defined scope, even excluding the owner; a sole licence allows the owner and one licensee; a non-exclusive licence can be granted to several licensees. The choice affects price and strategy and should be deliberate.
In many jurisdictions a licence can or should be recorded against the registration, which can matter for enforcement and for the licensee's standing to act. We advise on recordal where it is available and worthwhile.
Brand royalty income can interact with the Belgian innovation income deduction and other regimes, so we look at the licensing and tax positions together rather than in isolation.
%402x.svg){kind=icon}
%402x.svg){kind=icon}
%402x.svg){kind=small}